From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
2:21-cv-0600 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0600 WBS AC P

07-06-2021

AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a former inmate at Stanton Correctional Facility, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 6), are ADOPTED in full, and

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
2:21-cv-0600 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Case Details

Full title:AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0600 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)