From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P

06-28-2021

AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 19, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Case Details

Full title:AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)