From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P

08-17-2021

AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed July 8, 2021, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) The July 8, 2021 order stated that failure to file an amended complaint within that time would result in the recommendation of dismissal of this action. (Id.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)