From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
2:21-cv-0409 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0409 AC P

11-29-2021

AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

By order filed August 10, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 6. The record reflects that after plaintiff filed a notice of change of address in another case, the screening order was re-served on plaintiff at his new address on October 6, 2021. Thirty days have now passed since the order was re-served and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an amended complaint. 1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. 2


Summaries of

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
2:21-cv-0409 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Gunn v. Stanton Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, Plaintiff, v. STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0409 AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)