From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunn v. City of Selma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2016
CA 15-00200-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CA 15-00200-C

08-22-2016

ERNEST BERNARD GUNN, SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SELMA, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. Thus, the Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Counts 8-14) set forth in the Complaint (Doc. 1-1 at 10-19) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and their state law claims (Counts 1-7) set forth in the Complaint (Doc. 1 at 3-7) are REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Dallas County, Alabama from whence they came. Further, as conceded by the Plaintiffs, their excessive force claim (Count 15), all claims against Defendant, Officer Toriano Neely, and all official capacity claims against Defendants, Detective Ray Blanks and former Chief of Police, William Riley, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE this the 22nd day of August 2016.

s/ WILLIAM E. CASSADY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gunn v. City of Selma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2016
CA 15-00200-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Gunn v. City of Selma

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST BERNARD GUNN, SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SELMA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

CA 15-00200-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 22, 2016)