From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gumm v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 23, 2017
No. 70580 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 70580

03-23-2017

JOHN HENRY GUMM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Appellant John Henry Gumm appeals from a district court order denying the motion for reconsideration and modification of sentence he filed on April 1, 2016. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g). --------

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's decision to deny reconsideration, see Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995), and Gumm's claim he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel during his probation revocation hearing falls outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence, see Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Accordingly, we conclude Gumm is not entitled to relief, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

John Henry Gumm

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Gumm v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 23, 2017
No. 70580 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Gumm v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HENRY GUMM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

No. 70580 (Nev. App. Mar. 23, 2017)