From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GUMM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 6, 2007
Case No. CIV-06-866-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-866-R.

November 6, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging violations of her constitutional right. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo for preliminary review. On October 3, 2007, Judge Arog issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommended that the Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted and that this action be dismissed. The record reflects that Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed therein nor has she sought an extension of time in which to respond. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY and Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Additionally, as recommended by Judge Argo, Plaintiff's claims against Unknown Federal Officers at FTC Oklahoma are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GUMM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 6, 2007
Case No. CIV-06-866-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2007)
Case details for

GUMM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTA RAE GUMM, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 6, 2007

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-866-R (W.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thunder Mountain Custom Cycles, Inc. v. Thiessen

In making such a determination, the court should consider such factors as: (1) whether the applicable statute…

Dustin Donley Constr. Servs. v. Rosenthal

Even if the first two Espinoza factors were to weigh in Plaintiff's favor-which it has not shown-the Court…