From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gulotta v. Fifth Avenue Coach Company

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 23, 1937
165 Misc. 101 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)

Opinion

November 23, 1937.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of New York.

Henry J. Smith [ J.M. Sheen of counsel], for the appellant.

Sol Silverman, for the respondent.


While it was proper, and so conceded by defendant's counsel, to ask the plaintiff whether he had told defendant's driver after the accident that he, the plaintiff, had not been hurt as a result of the collision, the ruling permitting the conversation between plaintiff and the driver to establish defendant's liability presents reversible error.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — LYDON, LEVY and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Gulotta v. Fifth Avenue Coach Company

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 23, 1937
165 Misc. 101 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
Case details for

Gulotta v. Fifth Avenue Coach Company

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GULOTTA, Respondent, v. FIFTH AVENUE COACH COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1937

Citations

165 Misc. 101 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
300 N.Y.S. 648