From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gulley v. Haymaker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2009
Civil Action No. 06-131J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-131J.

March 23, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2009, after the Plaintiff, Willie Gene Gulley, Jr., filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Summary Judgment was filed by defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until March 23, 2009, to file written objections thereto, upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 64] is GRANTED pursuant to to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Gulley v. Haymaker

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2009
Civil Action No. 06-131J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Gulley v. Haymaker

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE GENE GULLEY, JR., Plaintiff v. SCOTT HAYMAKER; DOUG KUMAR; DONALD…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 23, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-131J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wenhold v. Lynn

Consequently, Wenhold has failed to state a claim for relief pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's due…

Wenhold v. Gaglione

Consequently, Wenhold has failed to state a claim for relief pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's due…