From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gulf States Utilities Company v. Roger

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1966
182 So. 2d 194 (La. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 1583.

January 18, 1966. Rehearing Denied February 7, 1966.

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette; Jerome E. Domengeaux, Judge.

Bailey Mouton, by W. C. Hollier, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

McBride Brewster, by William H. McBride, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, TATE and HOOD, JJ.


This expropriation suit, instituted against Mary Comeaux Roger, is one of the several such cases which were consolidated for trial and appeal with Gulf States Utilities Company v. Cormier, La. App., 182 So.2d 176.

Defendant owns Parcel 22-A and Lot 6, as those tracts are shown on the plat which we prepared in the above cited case. A portion of Parcel 22-A is included in the servitude being taken by plaintiff, but no part of Lot 6, which is a separate and independent tract, is being taken or invaded by plaintiff for any purpose. One of the demands of defendant is for consequential damages to Lot 6 as a result of the taking.

The trial judge awarded defendant $775.00 for the servitude taken, $734.00 as severance damages and $180.00 as consequential damages to Lot 6. Plaintiff appealed, and defendant has answered the appeal demanding an increase in the awards of damages and in the fees allowed the expert witnesses.

All of the issues presented here were discussed fully in the above cited case, and in Gulf States Utilities Company v. Comeaux, La. App., 182 So.2d 183, and in Gulf States Utilities Company v. Comeaux, La. App., 182 So.2d 187. Applying the reasons assigned in those cases to the instant suit, we conclude that the judgment appealed from must be amended to delete the award of consequential damages, but that in other respects the judgment should be affirmed.

For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is amended by reducing the award to defendant from the sum of $1689.00 to the sum of $1509.00. In all other respects, and as thus amended, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

Amended and affirmed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Gulf States Utilities Company v. Roger

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1966
182 So. 2d 194 (La. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Gulf States Utilities Company v. Roger

Case Details

Full title:GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Mary Comeaux…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 1966

Citations

182 So. 2d 194 (La. Ct. App. 1966)