Opinion
No C 09-5733 VRW.
April 17, 2010
ORDER
On March 31, 2010, the court ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be remanded to San Mateo County superior court, as the amended complaint contains no federal claims. Doc #32. The deadline to respond to the court's order has passed, and no party has objected to the proposed remand. See Doc ##33, 36.
Because all federal claims have been dismissed, remand is appropriate. 28 USC § 1367(c)(3); see also Wren v Sletten Construction Co, 654 F2d 529, 536 (9th Cir 1981) ("When the state issues apparently predominate and all federal claims are dismissed before trial, the proper exercise of discretion requires dismissal of the state claims."). Accordingly, the action is hereby REMANDED to San Mateo County superior court. The clerk is directed to terminate all motions and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.