From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guity v. Santos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 5, 2019
18 CIVIL 10387 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2019)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 10387 (PKC)

12-05-2019

NAZIM I. GUITY, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SANTOS, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 5, 2019, the motions of Santos and Sony to dismiss the complaint are GRANTED. Plaintiff having failed to either (a) serve Alcover and We Loud within the time provided in Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., or (b) seek an exclusion of time to do so, Alcover and We Loud are dismissed without prejudice and judgment is entered for the defendants; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

December 5, 2019

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Guity v. Santos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 5, 2019
18 CIVIL 10387 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Guity v. Santos

Case Details

Full title:NAZIM I. GUITY, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SANTOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 5, 2019

Citations

18 CIVIL 10387 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2019)