From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guion v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
43 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1978

Decided February 7, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MILTON SANDERS, J.

Monroe E. Stein for appellant.

Douglas A. Boeckmann for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs.

On the record before us there is no predicate for punitive damages as a matter of law. Even assuming that the security supervisor's failure to inspect the counter was relevant to the false imprisonment cause of action, under the circumstances here, while his conduct could be found to be careless, it did not rise to the level of wantonness or maliciousness (cf. Walker v Sheldon, 10 N.Y.2d 401, 404 [FULD, J.]). And, since the evidence was insufficient to support plaintiff's claim for exemplary damages against all three employees through which the store acted, a fortiori there was no basis for recovery of such damages against their employer (see Walker v Lord Taylor, 236 App. Div. 111; 10 Encyclopedia New York Law, Damages, § 831, p 346).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Guion v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
43 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Guion v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RENEE GUION, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED DRY GOODS CORP. (LORD TAYLOR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1978

Citations

43 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1978)
403 N.Y.S.2d 465
374 N.E.2d 364

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Times Square Stores Corporation

I perceive no basis for a punitive damage award against the employer and therefore dissent. Putting aside the…

Williams v. City of Buffalo

This confusion could have been resolved by further investigation, for the jail records revealed that there…