From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guinan v. Trotta

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 1, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

December 1, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MAX M. MELTZER, J.

Harry Scheer for appellant.

Hallam M. Richardson and John J. Howley for respondents.


The order of the Supreme Court was predicated on procedure only, not on the merits of plaintiff's application. She was relegated to a plenary action, and therefore the court below erred in considering the order of the Supreme Court as res judicata to this action.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs to plaintiff, and motion denied.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Guinan v. Trotta

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 1, 1960
28 Misc. 2d 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Guinan v. Trotta

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH GUINAN, Appellant, v. EMANUELE TROTTA et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1960

Citations

28 Misc. 2d 695 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
219 N.Y.S.2d 964