From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guinade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 3, 2006
940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 5D06-2190.

November 3, 2006.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, James R. Clayton, Judge.

Jerry L. Guinade, Chipley, Pro Se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy D. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Jerry L. Guinade appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Guinade alleges that he is entitled to postconviction relief. Specifically, he contends that the trial court violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720 by not asking him if there was any legal cause why he should not be sentenced following his conviction, and by not giving him an opportunity to present evidence and argument before pronouncing sentence. We affirm. Rule 3.850 does not authorize relief based on grounds that could have been or should have been raised at trial, and, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence. This claim could or should have been raised on direct appeal, and, therefore, is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guinade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 3, 2006
940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Guinade v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerry L. GUINADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 3, 2006

Citations

940 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)