From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guillory v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 23, 2014
NO. 09-14-00437-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 23, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00437-CR

10-23-2014

HEYMAN HAROLD GUILLORY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 07-00940

ORDER

This is an appeal from the denial of a pro se motion for DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01-.05 (West 2006 & Supp. 2014). On October 16, 2014, Guillory filed a pro se motion for appointment of appellate counsel. The statutory right to counsel granted by Article 64.01(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure extends to the appeal of an order entered under Chapter 64. Mindieta v. State, 132 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, order).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal be abated and the cause be remanded to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether Guillory is indigent. If Guillory is indigent, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent Guillory on appeal. Any hearings conducted by the trial court pursuant to this order must be recorded. A reporter's record of such hearings, together with a clerk's record containing any orders and findings entered by the trial court in connection with this order, shall be filed by November 19, 2014. All appellate timetables are suspended until the supplemental record here ordered has been filed, or until further order of this Court.

ORDER ENTERED October 23, 2014.

PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Guillory v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 23, 2014
NO. 09-14-00437-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 23, 2014)
Case details for

Guillory v. State

Case Details

Full title:HEYMAN HAROLD GUILLORY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Oct 23, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-14-00437-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 23, 2014)