From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guillory v. McClinton

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
May 1, 1978
359 So. 2d 223 (La. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 11989.

May 1, 1978.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PARISH OF ASCENSION, NO. 21654 STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE PENROSE C. ST. AMANT, J.

Frank P. Trosclair, Jr., Taylor, Trosclair Richard, Opelousas, for plaintiff and appellant.

Raymond Morgan Allen, Lafayette, and C. W. Franklin, Baton Rouge, for defendants and appellees.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.


This is a suit against the executive officers and supervisory personnel of plaintiff's employer. The lower court dismissed on the grounds that Act 147 of 1976 amending R.S. 23:1032 and 23:1101 was retroactive in application. We reverse and remand.

The general rule is that statutes are of prospective application only. The exceptions occur when (1) the statute expressly provides that it is to be applied retroactively; (2) When the statute is procedural; (3) when it is interpretative; and (4) when it is curative or remedial.

Act 147 of 1976 does not expressly provide that it should be retroactive in application. The assertions that the statute was procedural, interpretative, curative or remedial were made and answered negatively in Green v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 352 So.2d 366 (La.App. 4th Cir., 1977); writ refused, La., 354 So.2d 210 (1978) and Billedeaux v. Adams, 355 So.2d 1345 (La.App. 3d Cir., 1978).

For these reasons, we reverse and remand at appellees' costs.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Guillory v. McClinton

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
May 1, 1978
359 So. 2d 223 (La. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Guillory v. McClinton

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK GUILLORY v. DELBERT BOB McCLINTON ET AL

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: May 1, 1978

Citations

359 So. 2d 223 (La. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Aetna Casualty Surety

Act 147 of 1976 cannot be applied retroactively so as to bar a cause of action against an executive officer…

Opinion Number

LSA-R.S. 1:2. This general rule, however, is subject to several commonly accepted exceptions: (1) where the…