From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guidry v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-1074 (W.D. La. Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-1074

06-05-2013

TIMOTHY GUIDRY La. DOC#321539 v. BURL CAIN, WARDEN


JUDGE DOHERTY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA


JUDGMENT

These matters were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and considering the objections from the parties, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, Timothy Guidry's Motion to Appoint Counsel[Doc. 16] and his Motion for Hearing[Doc. 17] are DENIED. The Rule 60(b) motion[Doc. 14] is deemed a successive petition for habeas corpus, and it is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction and as untimely and without a basis in fact or law.

________________

Rebecca F. Doherty

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Guidry v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-1074 (W.D. La. Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Guidry v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY GUIDRY La. DOC#321539 v. BURL CAIN, WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-1074 (W.D. La. Jun. 5, 2013)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Warden

The judgment entered on the 1997 habeas petition does not fall within that description. See Guidry v. Cain,…