From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guidewire Software, Inc. v. Chookaszian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 11, 2012
Case No. 12-CV-03224-LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2012)

Summary

finding motion to compel arbitration was not "wholly groundless" where arbitration clause broadly covered all matters "'arising out of or relating to'" the agreement in question

Summary of this case from Lithium Ion Batters Antitrust Litig. v. LG Chem Am., Inc.

Opinion

Case No. 12-CV-03224-LHK

10-11-2012

GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE, INC. Plaintiff, v. DENNIS CHOOKASZIAN, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE AND RELATED

DEADLINES

On October 5, 2012, the parties submitted a stipulation requesting that the Court continue the case management conference scheduled for November 1, 2012 as well as the ADR deadlines in this case until after the Court resolves Plaintiff Guidewire's pending Motion to Stay Arbitration and Defendant Chookaszian's Motion to Compel Arbitration. The parties' request for an order continuing the case management conference and ADR deadlines is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Guidewire Software, Inc. v. Chookaszian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oct 11, 2012
Case No. 12-CV-03224-LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2012)

finding motion to compel arbitration was not "wholly groundless" where arbitration clause broadly covered all matters "'arising out of or relating to'" the agreement in question

Summary of this case from Lithium Ion Batters Antitrust Litig. v. LG Chem Am., Inc.
Case details for

Guidewire Software, Inc. v. Chookaszian

Case Details

Full title:GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE, INC. Plaintiff, v. DENNIS CHOOKASZIAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-CV-03224-LHK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Lithium Ion Batters Antitrust Litig. v. LG Chem Am., Inc.

The "wholly groundless" test, as articulated by other courts, is intended to "prevent[] a party from…