From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guichard v. Universal City Studios, LLLP

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jun 23, 2007
CASE NO. c 06-6392 JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. c 06-6392 JSW.

June 23, 2007


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS


Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

Settlement Conference (ADR L.R. 77) (available to pro se litigants)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ____________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline ________________________________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

Settlement Conference

Deadline for ADR session

90 days from the date of this order.
other

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Guichard v. Universal City Studios, LLLP

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jun 23, 2007
CASE NO. c 06-6392 JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Guichard v. Universal City Studios, LLLP

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GUICHARD, Plaintiff(s), v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, LLLP, Does…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. c 06-6392 JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2007)