From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 2010
598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 06-56306.

March 12, 2010.

Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 12, 2010
598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Case Details

Full title:Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

598 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta

Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 582 F.3d 996 (9th Cir. 2009).Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 598 F.3d 1061 (9th…