From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 26, 2022
3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD

01-26-2022

BRANDON GUEVARA-PONTIFES, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondents have filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (second request) (ECF No. 22) to answer or otherwise respond to Petitioner's First Amended Petition (ECF No. 18). The Court finds the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore good cause exists to grant Respondents' motion.

It is therefore ordered that the motion for enlargement of time (second request) (ECF No. 22) is granted. Respondents will have up to and including March 7, 2022, to file an answer or other response to the first amended petition.


Summaries of

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 26, 2022
3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Guevara-Pontifes v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON GUEVARA-PONTIFES, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 26, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00652-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)