From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guerrero v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2014
Case No. EDCV 13-0092-JGB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-0092-JGB (JPR)

12-29-2014

DAVID GUERRERO, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY SNIFF et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R. He mainly repeats arguments made in his opposition to Defendants' summary judgment motion and argues the merits of his claims, which are not at issue given the Magistrate Judge's finding that Defendants' motion should be granted because Plaintiff never exhausted his administrative remedies.

Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which Plaintiff objected, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Pitchess motion is DENIED as moot, and judgment be entered for Defendants. DATED: December 29, 2014

/s/_________

JESUS G. BERNAL

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Guerrero v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2014
Case No. EDCV 13-0092-JGB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Guerrero v. Sniff

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GUERRERO, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY SNIFF et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-0092-JGB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Pantoja v. California

These allegations are insufficient to excuse Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his remedies. Guerrero v. Sniff, …