From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guerra v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 3, 1993
623 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2485.

September 3, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, John W. Watson, III, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and S.C. VanVoorhees, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


It has become axiomatic under Florida sentencing law that a court may not depart from the guidelines without providing timely filed written reasons. Here, by supporting the departure only with oral reasons at the sentencing hearing, the trial court erroneously imposed a sentence one and one-half years in excess of the guidelines. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 1990). The failure to support the departure deprives the trial court of the opportunity to impose the harsher sentence upon remand. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990). The judgment of conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated and we remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guerra v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 3, 1993
623 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Guerra v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHEROKEE GUERRA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 3, 1993

Citations

623 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Ruff v. State

As to the second ground for appeal, appellee concedes the trial judge erred in imposing a departure sentence…