Because the trial court determined that a retrospective competency evaluation is not feasible, the appropriate disposition of this appeal is to reverse Appellant's conviction and remand for a new trial. See Ex parteWinfrey, 581 S.W.2d 698, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979) (if it is not possible to make a retrospective determination of applicant's competency, or if applicant is found to have been incompetent when tried, he must have a new trial); see also Guerra v. State, No. 11-21-00010-CR, 2022 WL 16984318, at *3 (Tex. App.-Eastland Nov. 17, 2022, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (reversing appellant's revocation of community supervision and remanding for a new trial where trial court determined retrospective competency trial was not feasible).