From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guernsey v. Rexford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 7, 1875
63 N.Y. 631 (N.Y. 1875)

Summary

In Guernsey v. Rexford, 63 N.Y. 631 (1875), the Court held that the mere rendering of an account does not make it an account stated, and failure to object to the account raises only a presumption of assent, which may be rebutted by circumstances tending to demonstrate a contrary inference.

Summary of this case from Cach, LLC v. Kugelman

Opinion

Argued November 30, 1875

Decided December 7, 1875

R.A. Stanton for the appellant.

George W. Ray for the respondents.



FOLGER, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

MILLER, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Guernsey v. Rexford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 7, 1875
63 N.Y. 631 (N.Y. 1875)

In Guernsey v. Rexford, 63 N.Y. 631 (1875), the Court held that the mere rendering of an account does not make it an account stated, and failure to object to the account raises only a presumption of assent, which may be rebutted by circumstances tending to demonstrate a contrary inference.

Summary of this case from Cach, LLC v. Kugelman

In Guernsey v. Rexford, 63 NY 631 (1875), the Court held that the mere rendering of an account does not make it an account stated, and failure to object to the account raises only a presumption of assent, which may be rebutted by circumstances tending to demonstrate a contrary inference.

Summary of this case from Cach, LLC v. Kugelman
Case details for

Guernsey v. Rexford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM B. GUERNSEY et al., Respondents, v . BENJAMIN F. REXFORD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 7, 1875

Citations

63 N.Y. 631 (N.Y. 1875)

Citing Cases

Reusens v. Arkenburgh

The plaintiff denies that he had any conversation with the defendant concerning compound interest. The…

Kent v. Wilson

It is well settled that the rendition of an account does not make an account stated, and the omission of…