From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guenther v. BP Ret. Accumulation Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 31, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00995 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00995

03-31-2021

FREDRIC A. GUENTHER, ETAL., Plaintiffs. v. BP RETIREMENT ACCUMULATION PLAN, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 8, 2021, Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. (Dkt. 191) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 236. On March 12, 2021, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 267) recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. (Dkt. 191) be GRANTED.

On March 26, 2021, Defendants filed their Objections. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made." After conducting this de novo review, the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id.; see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

The Court has carefully considered the Objections; the Memorandum and Recommendation; the pleadings; and the record. The Court ACCEPTS Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 267) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and

(2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. (Dkt. 191) is GRANTED; and

(3) The following class and subclass is CERTIFIED under Rule 23(b)(2):

General Class: All persons under age 50 as of January 1, 1989 who were active participants in the BP America Retirement Accumulation Plan as of January 1, 1989, and whose retirement benefit under the BP America Inc. Retirement Plan (ARP) exceeds the retirement benefit offered (or that will be offered) by the BP America Retirement Accumulation Plan (RAP), as amended on the benefit commencement date, and the beneficiaries and estates of such persons and alternate payees under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order.

Subclass: All persons under age 50 as of January 1, 1989, and who were active participants in the BP America Retirement Accumulation Plan as of January 1, 1989, and whose retirement benefit under the BP America Inc. Retirement Plan (ARP) exceeds the retirement benefit offered (or that will be offered) by the BP America Retirement Accumulation Plan (RAP), as amended on the benefit commencement date, and the beneficiaries and estates of such persons and alternate payees under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who signed a release upon separation of employment. This class is a subset of the first class.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 31st day of March 2021.

/s/_________

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Guenther v. BP Ret. Accumulation Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Mar 31, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00995 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Guenther v. BP Ret. Accumulation Plan

Case Details

Full title:FREDRIC A. GUENTHER, ETAL., Plaintiffs. v. BP RETIREMENT ACCUMULATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00995 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2021)

Citing Cases

Bryant v. Intercontinental Terminals Co.

Guenther v. BP Ret. Accumulation Plan, No. 4:16-CV-00995, 2021 WL 1216377, at *4 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2021),…