From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guclu v. Law Offices of Philwin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52611 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-1586 K C.

Decided December 18, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Dawn Marie Jimenez, J.), entered April 11, 2008. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, upon a motion to vacate a default judgment and restore the matter to the calendar, sua sponte dismissed the action against all the defendants.

ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, plaintiffs' notice of appeal as to the portion of the order that, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint against all the defendants is treated as an application for leave to appeal from said portion of the order, and leave to appeal is granted ( see CCA 1702 [c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed without costs, the provision which, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint against all the defendants is stricken, the complaint is reinstated and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for all further proceedings.

PRESENT: GOLIA, J.P., PESCE and WESTON, JJ.


Plaintiffs commenced this action against their former attorneys, alleging that defendants had failed to provide proper services. After an inquest, a judgment was entered against all of the defendants. Thereafter, upon a motion to vacate the default judgment and restore the matter to the calendar, the Civil Court vacated the default and, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint against all of the defendants with prejudice on the ground that the action was time-barred. We find that the court erred in sua sponte dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs were denied a meaningful opportunity to contest the issue of whether the complaint was time-barred, and defendants had not met their initial burden of demonstrating that the action was untimely ( see Town of Hempstead v Lizza Indus., 293 AD2d 739; Fergusson v Dumbacher , 21 Misc 3d 145 [A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52547[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2008]). Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, the provision which, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint against all the defendants is stricken, the complaint is reinstated and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for all further proceedings.

Golia, J.P., Pesce and Weston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guclu v. Law Offices of Philwin

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52611 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

Guclu v. Law Offices of Philwin

Case Details

Full title:MEHMET GUCLU, DURSUN GUCLU and FATMA GUCLU, Appellants, v. LAW OFFICES OF…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52611 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)