From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Texas
Feb 22, 1961
344 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1961)

Opinion

No. A-8198.

February 22, 1961.

Appeal from the District Court, McLennan County,

Dunnam Dunnam, Waco, for petitioner.

Richey, Sheehy Teeling, Waco, for respondent.


While the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals ( 341 S.W.2d 461) on the construction of Article 2226, Vernon's Ann.Civ. Stats., relating to the allowance of attorney's fees, is strictly in accordance with our holding in Meaders v. Biskamp, Tex.Sup., 316 S.W.2d 75, and although we approve of the other holdings made by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion, we may not refuse the application for writ of error because the matter of the construction of Article 2226 was not raised in this Court by application for writ of error. The respondent, while unsuccessful upon the attorney's fees point in the Court of Civil Appeals, filed no application for writ of error in this Court. As a consequence, our authority to decide the issue has not been invoked. Accordingly the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.

Supreme Court of Texas
Feb 22, 1961
344 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1961)
Case details for

Guay v. Schneider, Bernet & Hickman, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Roland H. GUAY, Petitioner, v. SCHNEIDER, BERNET HICKMAN, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Feb 22, 1961

Citations

344 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1961)
161 Tex. 560

Citing Cases

Van Zandt v. Fort Worth Press

We have heretofore held that in order for a claim to be founded "upon a sworn account or accounts" within the…

Superior Sta. v. Berol

Defendant's answer denying the justness of the account was verified by an affiant only 'to the best of his…