From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guarnier v. American Dredging Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 16, 1992
588 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1992)

Opinion

Decided January 16, 1992

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Ira Gammerman, J.

Howard W. Burns, Jr., pro se.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, without costs, and the sanction imposed pursuant to 22 N.Y.CRR 130-1.1 (c) vacated because the reviewable record of the conduct of the appellant attorney during jury selection, which prompted the imposition of the sanction over two months later, is devoid of the required basis for concluding that the conduct, however else it could be characterized, was "frivolous" within the meaning of the sanctions rule.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Guarnier v. American Dredging Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 16, 1992
588 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for

Guarnier v. American Dredging Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES T. GUARNIER, Respondent, v. AMERICAN DREDGING CO., Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 16, 1992

Citations

588 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1992)
588 N.E.2d 92
580 N.Y.S.2d 194

Citing Cases

Rozen v. Nite Rider Grp., Inc.

Watson v City of New York, 178 A.D.2d 126 (1991), or a lack of basis found in the record. Guarnier v American…

Pan World Constr. Corp. v. 791 Park Avenue

Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that its motion for renewal or reargument was actually a…