From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guardian Angel Foundation v. Holmer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1221-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1221-LKK-CMK.

May 13, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, which is apparently a corporation or some other unincorporated business association, brings this civil action. Plaintiff is not, however, represented in this case by counsel as required by local rules. See E. Dist. Cal. Local Rule 183(a); see also D-Beam Ltd. Partnership v. Roller Derby Skates, 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing Licht v. Am. W. Airlines (In re Am. W. Airlines), 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994)). Because plaintiff cannot proceed pro se, see D-Beam, 366 F.3d at 974 n. 1, plaintiff will be required to retain counsel who shall file a notice of appearance within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall retain counsel who shall file a notice of appearance within 30 days of the date of this order.

DATED: May 12, 2011


Summaries of

Guardian Angel Foundation v. Holmer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1221-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Guardian Angel Foundation v. Holmer

Case Details

Full title:THE GUARDIAN ANGEL FOUNDATION Plaintiff, v. DANA HOLMER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1221-LKK-CMK (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)