From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guardia v. Prestige Default Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 14, 2021
2:21-cv-06447-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-06447-SB-MRW

10-14-2021

EDWIN IVAN GUARDIA, Plaintiff, v. PRESTIGE DEFAULT SERVICES ET AL., Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the separate Order of Dismissal entered this day, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Edwin Ivan Guardia's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Prestige Default Services; Briana Young; Ghidotti Berger, LLP and its employees; Michelle Rene Ghidotti, aka Michelle Ghidotti-Gonsalves; Chase Berger; Redwood Holdings, LLC and its employees; Sam Chandra; and the Law Offices of Sam Chandra and its employees is DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims, and Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

This is a Final Judgment. 1


Summaries of

Guardia v. Prestige Default Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 14, 2021
2:21-cv-06447-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Guardia v. Prestige Default Servs.

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN IVAN GUARDIA, Plaintiff, v. PRESTIGE DEFAULT SERVICES ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-06447-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2021)