Opinion
22 Civ. 2552 (KPF)
06-30-2022
LILING GUAN, individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. LASH PRINCESS 56 INC., d/b/a LASH PRINCESS 56, d/b/a LASH PRINCESS; OSCAR LIN; and QINYU LIU, a/k/a ULA LIU, Defendants.
ORDER
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, DISTRICT JUDGE
On June 16, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff Liling Guan to file either a brief in opposition to Defendants Lash Princess 56 Inc., Oscar Lin, and Qinyu Liu's motion to dismiss or an amended complaint on or before June 29, 2022. (Dkt. #16). The Court further explained that, if Plaintiff elected to file an amended complaint, the Court would deny Defendants' motion as moot. (Id.). Plaintiff thereafter filed an amended complaint on June 27, 2022. (Dkt. #21).Accordingly, Defendants' pending motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
Due to docketing errors, Plaintiff's amended complaint was initially rejected on June 27, 2022, and June 28, 2022. (See Dkt. #18, 20). Plaintiff successfully docketed the operative version of the amended complaint on June 29, 2022. (Dkt. #21).
Defendants are hereby ORDERED to file a letter stating whether they intend to move to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint or to file an answer on or before July 15, 2022.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 11.
SO ORDERED.