From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G.S. v. Diamond

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Sep 25, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2019–07068

09-25-2019

In the Matter of G.S. (Anonymous), Petitioner, v. Arthur DIAMOND, etc., et al., Respondents.

G. S., Jericho, NY, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Monica Hanna of counsel), for respondents Arthur Diamond and Norman St. George. John W. McConnell, New York, N.Y. (Sandra H. Irby of counsel), for respondents Supreme Court of the State of New York, in and for Nassau County, Maureen O'Connell, Clerk of the Court, Matrimonial Part, Nassau County, and New York State Office of Court Administration.


G. S., Jericho, NY, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Monica Hanna of counsel), for respondents Arthur Diamond and Norman St. George.

John W. McConnell, New York, N.Y. (Sandra H. Irby of counsel), for respondents Supreme Court of the State of New York, in and for Nassau County, Maureen O'Connell, Clerk of the Court, Matrimonial Part, Nassau County, and New York State Office of Court Administration.

RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondents, in effect, to transfer all issues related to child support and ancillary matters in a certain matrimonial action pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to the Family Court, Nassau County.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v. Scheinman , 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

G.S. v. Diamond

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Sep 25, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

G.S. v. Diamond

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of G.S. (Anonymous), petitioner, v. Arthur Diamond, etc., et…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Sep 25, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 6775
106 N.Y.S.3d 917