From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grutman v. Regents of the Univ. of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
CASE NO. 10-02347 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-02347 JCS

10-31-2011

NETTA GRUTMAN, Plaintiff, v, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN 166805) JEROME SCHREIBSTEIN (SBN 154051) GORDON & REES LLP Attorneys for Defendants THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, TODD MCGREGOR and JAMES JACOBS (EXEMPT FROM FEES, GOV. CODE § 6103) DAVID A. STEVENS (SBN 054635) EHUD GERSTEN (SBN 236159) Attorneys for Plaintiff NETTA GRUTMAN


MICHAEL D. BRUNO (SBN 166805)

JEROME SCHREIBSTEIN (SBN 154051)

GORDON & REES LLP

Attorneys for Defendants THE REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, TODD MCGREGOR and

JAMES JACOBS (EXEMPT FROM FEES, GOV. CODE § 6103)

DAVID A. STEVENS (SBN 054635)

EHUD GERSTEN (SBN 236159)

Attorneys for Plaintiff NETTA GRUTMAN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON DISMISSAL OF ACTION

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULTED BETWEEN PLAINTIFF NETTA GRUTMAN AND DEFENDANTS, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, TODD MCGREGOR AND JAMES JACOBS, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff's first (for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)) and second (for violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) claims for relief shall be dismissed with prejudice.

2. This matter shall be remanded to the Superior Court, County of San Francisco for further proceedings.

3. All parties reserve their rights to seek the recovery of legal fees and costs at the conclusion of this matter, except that no party shall be entitled to nor shall any party seek to recover its costs or legal fees incurred with respect to the following: (1) defendants' removal of this action from the State Court to the federal district court, (2) plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of her federal claims, and (3) the remand of this matter to the State Court. No party waives its rights to seek and recover legal fees and costs for the proceedings in federal district court, other than as to the specific proceedings associated with the original removal and the subsequent dismissal of the federal claims and remand of the action.

IT IS SO AGREED.

GORDON & REES LLP

MICHAEL D. BRUNO

JEROME SCHREIBSTEIN

Attorneys for Defendant THE REGENTS

OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,

TODD MCGREGOR and JAMES JACOBS

GERSTEN LAW GROUP

EHUD GERSTEN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NETTA GRUTMAN

DAVID A. STEVENS

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NETTA GRUTMAN

ORDER

BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND GOOD CAUSE OTHERWISE APPEARING, the Court Orders that:

1. Plaintiff's first (for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)) and second (for violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) claims for relief are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. This matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court, County of San Francisco for further proceedings.

3. All parties retain their rights to seek the recovery of legal fees and costs at the conclusion of this matter except that no party shall be entitled to nor shall any party seek to recover its costs or legal fees incurred with respect to the following: (1) defendants' removal of this action from the State Court to the federal district court, (2) plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of her federal claims, and (3) the remand of this matter to the State Court. No party waives its rights to seek and recover legal fees and costs for the proceedings in federal district court, other than as to the specific proceedings associated with the original removal and the subsequent dismissal of the federal claims and remand of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge

GERSTEN LAW GROUP

EHUD GERSTEN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DAVID A. STEVENS

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KETTA ORUTMAN

ORDER

BASED ON THE FOREGOING AND GOOD CAUSE OTHERWISE APPEARING, the Court Orders that:

1. Plaintiff's first (for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)) and second (for violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) claims for relief are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. This matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court, County of San Francisco for further proceedings.

3. All parties retain their rights to seek the recovery of legal fees and costs at the conclusion of this matter except that no party shall be entitled ~o nor shall any party seek to recover its costs or legal fees incurred with respect to the following: (1) defendants' removal of this action from the State Court to the federal district court, (2) plaintiff's voluntary dismissal of her federal claims, and (3) the remand of this matter to the State Court. No party waives its rights to seek and recover legal fees and costs for the proceedings in federal district court, other than as to the specific proceedings associated with the original removal and the subsequent dismissal of the federal claims and remand of the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Honorable Joseph C. Spero

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Grutman v. Regents of the Univ. of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2011
CASE NO. 10-02347 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Grutman v. Regents of the Univ. of California

Case Details

Full title:NETTA GRUTMAN, Plaintiff, v, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10-02347 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)