From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grunspan v. Walling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

February, 1910.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.


The court could not compel the plaintiff by a bill of particulars to elect on which promise she should rely. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Grunspan v. Walling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Grunspan v. Walling

Case Details

Full title:ANNA BERTHE GRUNSPAN, Appellant, v . WILLIAM ENGLISH WALLING, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1910

Citations

136 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)