From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruis v. Herald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02132-PAB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02132-PAB

08-29-2012

KATHERINE GRUIS, Plaintiff, v. LORI HERALD, DAVID B. DILLON, THE KROGER CO., d/b/a Kroger Shared Service Center-Hutchinson, d/b/a Dillon Companies, Inc., d/b/a City Market, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Court on the Order to Show Cause [Docket No. 4] issued by the Court on August 14, 2012. In the August 14 order, the Court concluded that plaintiff's filings fail to adequately invoke the Court's federal question jurisdiction. The Court noted, however, that the complaint contains information indicating that the Court may be able to exercise diversity jurisdiction, but that there is insufficient information in the complaint to assure the Court that such is the case. Therefore, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause on or before Friday, August 24, 2012 why this case involves a dispute between citizens of different states and should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff did not file any response to the Court's order. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that, for the reasons provided in the Court's Order to Show Cause [Docket No. 4], this case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gruis v. Herald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02132-PAB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Gruis v. Herald

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE GRUIS, Plaintiff, v. LORI HERALD, DAVID B. DILLON, THE KROGER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02132-PAB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)