Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Gruetzke v. City of Gresham

108 Or. App. 325 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Gruetzke v. City of Gresham

1 Citing case

  1. Hood River Valley Res. v. B. of County Comm

    193 Or. App. 485 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 9 times
    Holding the presence of "a number of procedural requirements" for making determination at issue was indicative of quasi-judicial function

    Because this appeal arises from the circuit court's ORCP 21 dismissal of the action based on the asserted legal insufficiency of the allegations of petitioners' amended petition for writ of review, we describe the material facts assuming the truth of the factual allegations of that petition. See Gruetzke v. City of Gresham, 108 Or. App. 325, 329, 815 P.2d 228, rev den, 312 Or. 527 (1991). Mt. Hood Meadows owns and operates resort and recreational facilities.