From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gruber v. Johnson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 25, 2024
2:23-cv-01824-FLA (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01824-FLA (MAA)

01-25-2024

Gary M. Gruber v. Ray Bon Johnson et al.


Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order Regarding Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24)

On December 11, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Complaint. (“Motion,” ECF No. 24.) On December 12, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff (“Plaintiff”) to file an Opposition to the Motion no later than January 11, 2024. (ECF No. 25.) The Court included an explicit caution: “Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the Motion may be construed as consent to the granting of the Motion and may result in dismissal of the action. C.D. Cal. L.R. 712.” (Id.)

To date, Plaintiff has not filed an Opposition to the Motion.

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by February 26, 2024 why the Court should not recommend that the lawsuit be dismissed for failure to file an Opposition to the Motion. If Plaintiff files an Opposition to the Motion on or before that date, the Order to Show Cause will be discharged, and no additional action need be taken.

Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Opposition to the Motion will be deemed as consent to the granting of the Motion and will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Gruber v. Johnson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 25, 2024
2:23-cv-01824-FLA (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Gruber v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Gary M. Gruber v. Ray Bon Johnson et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-01824-FLA (MAA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2024)