Opinion
No. 19-1843
12-23-2019
DIANE MARIE GROTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL M. NAKASONE, Defendant - Appellee.
Diane Marie Groth, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-02569-JKB) Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diane Marie Groth, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Diane Marie Groth appeals the district court's order granting Defendant summary judgment on Groth's retaliation, age and gender discrimination, and harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments raised on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Groth v. Nakasone, No. 1:16-cv-02569-JKB (D. Md. filed July 18, 2019 & entered July 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED