Opinion
23-11355
06-20-2024
BRAYTON JAMES GROTH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, NICHOLAS HILL, SCOTT MCINTYRE, RAYMOND FAES, ANTHONY PAREDES, and NICHOLAS KRUMM, Defendants.
ORDER STRIKING IMPROPER FILING
Honorable David M. Lawson, Judge
On June 19, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the plaintiff's deadline to respond to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The filing included a proposed order that counsel evidently intended for the Court to sign and enter. The inclusion of the proposed order was improper because such orders never should be filed by counsel on the electronic docket. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1 cmt. (citing Elec. Filing Pols. & Procs. R. 11(a)). Proposed orders should be submitted to the Court through the CM/ECF Utilities function.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties' stipulation to extend the response deadline (ECF No. 36) is STRICKEN.