From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grosso v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 2006
2:06-cv-477 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2006)

Opinion

2:06-cv-477.

July 6, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Richard Gennerro Grosso's (Grosso) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on April 10, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for Report and Recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on June 13, 2006, recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Grosso be dismissed because he has failed to state a cognizable federal claim. Also, it was recommended that a Certificate of Appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on the Petitioner and Respondents by First Class United States Mail. Objections filed by the Petitioner on June 20, 2006, have been reviewed and found to be without merit. Afterde novo review of all pleadings and documents filed in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, dated June 13, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Grosso v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 6, 2006
2:06-cv-477 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Grosso v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD GENNERRO GROSSO, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS FOLINO, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 6, 2006

Citations

2:06-cv-477 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2006)