From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grossman v. Beato

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50138 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

2005-945 N C.

Decided February 2, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Howard S. Miller, J.), dated May 19, 2005. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and McCABE, JJ.


UDCA 1807 provides that "[a] person commencing an action upon a small claim under this article shall be deemed to have waived all right to appeal, except that either party may appeal on the sole grounds that substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law." Since an order in a small claims action denying a motion for summary judgment only has the effect of requiring a party to proceed to trial, it is not a denial of substantial justice and, thus, the instant order is not appealable ( see Jean-Louis v. Travelers/Aetna Ins. Co., NYLJ, Apr. 6, 1998 [App Term, 9th 10th Jud Dists]; Goidal v. Jackson Mgt. Corp., NYLJ, May 21, 1986 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]; Markowitz v. The New York Racing Assoc., Inc., NYLJ, Jan. 9, 1986 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

Rudolph, P.J., Angiolillo and McCabe, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grossman v. Beato

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50138 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Grossman v. Beato

Case Details

Full title:ELLIOT A. GROSSMAN, M.D., Appellant, v. VITO BEATO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 50138 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
814 N.Y.S.2d 890