From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. United States Dept. of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2023-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-2023-M-BH

07-24-2012

JAMAL GROSS Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated May 31, 2012, and treating Plaintiff Gross's document entitled Traverse Response as objections, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objections and finds that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

By separate judgment, all of Plaintiff's claims against the United States, the DOJ, the BOP, and Defendants Cruz, Anthony, and Rhodes, and the gross negligence and medical malpractice claims against Dr. Bret Downing, will be DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

______________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Gross v. United States Dept. of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 24, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2023-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Gross v. United States Dept. of Justice

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL GROSS Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-2023-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Jul. 24, 2012)