From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Stufflebean

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 8, 2022
21-CV-2109 JLS (DEB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-2109 JLS (DEB)

03-08-2022

DARO B. GROSS, Plaintiff, v. JOCELYN MICHELS STUFFLEBEAN; JOHN STUFFLEBEAN; DAVID I. GROSS; MIEKE STRAND; LAUREN E. JONES; JULIE A. AMEDE; JOSEPH F. DERROUGH; WILLIAM HOYT; and BART CALL, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

On February 3, 2022, the Court granted Defendants Jocelyn Michels Stufflebean, John Stufflebean, David I. Gross, Mieke Strand, Lauren E. Jones, and Bart Call's unopposed Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 13 (the “Order”). The Order granted Plaintiff twenty-eight days in which to file an amended complaint and cautioned: “ Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended pleading in accordance with this Order, the Court will enter a final order dismissing this civil action based on Plaintiff's failure to prosecute in compliance with a court order requiring amendment. ” Order at 3 (emphasis in original) (citation omitted).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint in accordance with the Order. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gross v. Stufflebean

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 8, 2022
21-CV-2109 JLS (DEB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Gross v. Stufflebean

Case Details

Full title:DARO B. GROSS, Plaintiff, v. JOCELYN MICHELS STUFFLEBEAN; JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

21-CV-2109 JLS (DEB) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)