From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Lebel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2021
199 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2018–11874 Index No. 17489/09

11-10-2021

Lonnie S. GROSS, respondent, v. Alex LEBEL, et al., appellants.

Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, NY, for appellants. Rubin & Rothman, LLC, Islandia, NY (Eric S. Pillischer of counsel), for respondent.


Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, NY, for appellants.

Rubin & Rothman, LLC, Islandia, NY (Eric S. Pillischer of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Richard Velasquez, J.), dated June 8, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Bernard J. Graham, J.), entered December 22, 2014, upon their default in appearing for trial.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A default judgment was entered against the defendants on December 22, 2014, after they defaulted in appearing at trial and an inquest was conducted. That judgment was served on the defendants with notice of entry on December 26, 2014. By order to show cause dated February 13, 2018, the defendants moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate the default judgment. In an order dated June 8, 2018, the Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion. The defendants appeal.

That branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate the judgment entered upon their default was untimely (see Barnett v. Diamond Fin. Co., Inc., 187 A.D.3d 974, 975, 131 N.Y.S.3d 198 ; US Natl. Bank Assn. v. Melton, 90 A.D.3d 742, 744, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 ). Moreover, the defendants failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for the default or a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see Cox v. Marshall, 161 A.D.3d 1140, 1141, 78 N.Y.S.3d 212 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion.

DILLON, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, CHRISTOPHER and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gross v. Lebel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2021
199 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Gross v. Lebel

Case Details

Full title:Lonnie S. GROSS, respondent, v. Alex LEBEL, et al., appellants.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
154 N.Y.S.3d 265

Citing Cases

Walker v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

As the majority notes, under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, "where a party assumes a certain position in…

Rigwan v. Neus

A party seeking to vacate an order entered upon its default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the…