Opinion
No. 2009-03428.
September 28, 2010.
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Panepinto, J.), entered March 30, 2009, which denied his motion for pendente lite relief.
Howard Benjamin, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
Segal Greenberg, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Philip C. Segal of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Dillon, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the parties' "Marital Separation and Property Settlement Agreement" was properly acknowledged ( see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; Weinstein v Weinstein, 36 AD3d 797, 798). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for pendente lite relief was properly denied ( see Klein v Klein, 246 AD2d 195, 198).