From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Chappelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1964
21 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

May 11, 1964


In a vendees' action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 2, 1963, which denied their motion for summary judgment and for cancellation of a lis pendens filed against the property. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted; complaint dismissed and lis pendens directed to be cancelled of record. The Statute of Frauds (Real Property Law, § 259) was pleaded as a defense. The papers submitted establish that neither the contract of sale nor any note or memorandum was subscribed by the defendant vendors or by their lawful agent thereunto authorized by any writing. The complaint therefore must be dismissed ( Mondrus v. Salt Haven Corp., 270 App. Div. 1030, mot. for lv. to app. den. 270 App. Div. 104 6; Singer v. Klebanow, 9 Misc.2d 1016). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order for the reasons stated by the Justice at Special Term.


Summaries of

Gross v. Chappelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1964
21 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Gross v. Chappelle

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE J. GROSS et al., Respondents, v. WAYNE CHAPPELLE et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Spodek v. Riskin

may well exist here, although no definite conclusion may yet be reached on this issue since the parties…

Chappelle v. Gross

In that action a lis pendens was filed against the property, and the plaintiff here (defendant there) moved…