From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grosinger v. Thill

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
May 26, 2016
2016 N.D. 89 (N.D. 2016)

Opinion

No. 20160047

05-26-2016

In the Interest of Maurice Robert Thill Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Maurice Robert Thill, Respondent and Appellant

Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 Second Ave. NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for petitioner and appellee. Kent M. Morrow, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 Second Ave. NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for petitioner and appellee. Kent M. Morrow, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Maurice Robert Thill appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Thill argues the district court's order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]

Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.Daniel J. CrothersDale V. SandstromCarol Ronning KapsnerLisa Fair McEvers


Summaries of

Grosinger v. Thill

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
May 26, 2016
2016 N.D. 89 (N.D. 2016)
Case details for

Grosinger v. Thill

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of Maurice Robert Thill Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

2016 N.D. 89 (N.D. 2016)