From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grose v. Wakefield

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 15, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2064 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2064.

October 15, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2007, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, together with the objections filed by the Petitioner, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The objections to the Report and Recommendation are DENIED.
2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE COURT REMEDIES.
4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Grose v. Wakefield

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 15, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2064 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Grose v. Wakefield

Case Details

Full title:JARET STEVEN GROSE (GY-3069) v. DAVID WAKEFIELD, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 15, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2064 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 15, 2007)